Blogs

K Falls Herald & News calls for an end to legislative "sneak attacks".

heraldnews

Legislative process takes the low road in keeping secrets about bill sponsors

Editors
Klamath Falls Herald and News
April 20, 2011

There's a lot of talk about transparency in Salem these days. People in state government are claiming to do their best to make it easier for voters to find out what their legislators, other officials and employees are up to.

There are efforts to open up records and to make it easier for the public to find out how the money is spent. Some of the efforts actually seem be doing something.

It sounds pretty good, until something like House Bill 2442 comes along.    Read more ...

Help us build a movement

The Independent Party is looking for a few good men and women to help us organize local meetups around the state. If you are interested in attending a meetup, or helping us host one in your part of the state, please contact Party Secretary, Sal Peralta at 503-437-2833 to help coordinate an event.

Register-Guard slams "anonymous attack" on Independent Party

Register-Guard

An attack from nowhere

by Editorial Board
The Register-Guard
April 19, 2011

In the course of researching one minor outrage, another is discovered. The first was a doomed-from-the-start bill to prohibit Oregon political parties from using the word “independent” in their names. The bill met with widespread ridicule and condemnation, received no supporting testimony in a hearing last week and is headed for oblivion.

The second outrage, however, lives on, and one day could prove serious. No legislator’s name was attached to the bill. House Bill 2442 was filed before the session by the House Interim Committee on Rules with no listed sponsor, and the hearing occurred at the request of no identified committee member. It was presented to Oregonians as a product of immaculate political conception.

Party Responds to Inaccurate Op-Ed

Today the Oregonian published an op-ed by a person complaining about his experience with the IPO. We have sent this response to The Oregonian.

Dear Oregonian:

You today published an op-ed by Will Nunn about his experience with the Independent Party of Oregon. His assertions are not accurate.    Read more ...

"Dumb, Partisan, and Unconstitutional": The Oregonian opposes Independent Party "execution" bill

Oregonian

The War of Independents

by Editorial Board
The Oregonian
April 16, 2011

A failed bill in Salem won't be the last attack on the Independent Party, or on other minor parties

Any political party that lends its name to everyone from a two-term Democratic governor to a Republican climate-change denier has something of an identity crisis.

However, that's no excuse for the sneak attack that someone -- call them unknown parties -- made this week on the Independent Party of Oregon.

House Bill 2442, which would have forced the IPO to drop the word "independent" from its name, somehow made its way onto the agenda of the House Rules Committee without benefit of a sponsor or even one person willing to stand up publicly and support it. That's just as well since the bill was, even by Salem standards, a rare trifecta: dumb, partisan and unconstitutional.

Editor Hasso Hering Blasts Bill to Abolish Independent Party

democrat-herald

Editorial: What’s next, word police? (with comments)

by Hasso Hering
Democrat-Herald
April 13, 2011

A bill under consideration in Salem and scheduled for a hearing this afternoon, HB 2442, would prohibit the use of the word “independent” in the name of any political party. The sponsors of this little bit of nonsense seem to have gone to the “Alice in Wonderland Institute of Politics,” where they teach you to change reality by changing what things are called.

Or perhaps they learned how to neutralize their opponents at the Joe Stalin Graduate School of Political Maneuvering. Don’t like what the party does? Just ban its name.   

Former Secretaries of State Slam Attempt to Kill Independent Party

willamette week

Former Secretaries of State Slam Attempt to Kill Independent Party

by Nigel Jaquiss
April 13, 2011

The House Rules Committee today held a hearing on House Bill 2442, which would force the Independent Party of Oregon to drop the word "Independent" from its name. . . .

The heavy-handed attempt to side-swipe the IPO met with some equally weighty criticism today, particularly in the joint written testimony submitted by former Secretaries of State Norma Paulus (a Republican, who served from 1977 to 1985) and Phil Keisling (a Democrat, who served from 1991 to 1999).    Read more ...

IPO Secretary on Independent Party "execution" bill

Distinguished chairs, honorable members of the committee;

My name is Sal Peralta. I am here today to testify in opposition to House Bill 2442 on behalf of the Independent Party of Oregon.

This bill is so clearly unconstitutional that I wasn’t sure how seriously to take it. One of our members actually thought it was a prank. I like the tact that the Albany Democrat-Herald took in today’s editorial opposing this bill, that:

The sponsors of this little bit of nonsense seem to have gone to the “Alice in Wonderland Institute of Politics,” where they teach you to change reality by changing what things are called.

Or perhaps they learned how to neutralize their opponents at the Joe Stalin Graduate School of Political Maneuvering. Don’t like what the party does? Just ban its name.

But when a legislator or a group of legislators holds a proverbial gun to your head and tells you to do something, I think the best approach is to take it seriously. So here goes…

We have received written testimony in opposition to this bill from former Secretaries of State Norma Paulus and Phil Keisling. I quote in part from their testimony:

We are aware of no legal precedent in any jurisdiction in the United States that would allow a legislature to ban the use of a word in the name of a political party, and are highly skeptical that the Oregon Constitution, with its broad protections for free speech, would permit such an intrusion on the association and speech rights of a duly constituted political party. Pass this bill -- or even treat it semi-seriously -- and what's next? Bills to ban the word "republican" or "democratic" from other parties because one party in power feels threatened?

This bill is cynical, political mischief of the worst, most juvenile kind -- worthy of being thrown on the legislative scrap heap, so this body can get down to the important business at hand.